E
2
Entrusted Empowerment® Organizational Assessment

Gaining Clarity
in Complexity

Integral Advantage® · Robert Radi, Ph.D.

A research-validated organizational assessment that diagnoses the conditions for trust, empowerment, and sustained performance — benchmarked against a national dataset spanning 26 industries.

Request an assessment Enter your access code
Scroll to explore
~8 min
Completion time
33
Survey items
9
Constructs measured
11 yrs
Research & development
About the Assessment
"Half the money organizations invest in development initiatives is wasted. The trouble is, they don't know which half."

The Entrusted Empowerment® Organizational Assessment was developed to solve exactly this problem. Rather than guessing at organizational development priorities, the E² Assessment provides a data-driven, benchmarked diagnosis of the internal conditions that determine how your organization engages, performs, and adapts.

The assessment is built on the Entrusted Empowerment® conceptual framework, first developed by Robert Radi, Ph.D. in 2015 and refined over a decade of strategic consulting, executive development, and applied organizational research. It is not a theory — it is an actionable methodology that tells you precisely where to allocate your development resources.

With just 33 focused items and a completion time of approximately 8 minutes, the assessment is designed for broad organizational participation at all levels — generating the cross-sectional view needed for meaningful diagnosis.

Integral Advantage® · Gaining Clarity in Complexity · CenterForIA@gmail.com · integraladvantage.com

What the assessment
diagnoses

The E² Assessment measures nine validated constructs across three interdependent layers — each informing the next.

Dimensions
Strategic Clarity  ·  Operational Clarity  ·  Execution Clarity
Interplay Nodes
Sustained Competency  ·  Contextual Fairness  ·  Autonomy
Outcomes
Engagement  ·  Performance  ·  Adaptability
The Framework

Three dimensions.
Three interplay nodes.
Three outcomes.

Entrusted Empowerment® posits that the more explicit an organization's strategy, operations, and execution, the more competent, autonomous, and fair the organizational environment becomes — driving measurable outcomes in engagement, performance, and adaptability.

Dimensions
Strategic Clarity
Informed by Vision, Expectations, Communication, and Congruency
Operational Clarity
Informed by Function, Processes, Programs, and Action Learning
Execution Clarity
Informed by Responsibility, Accountability, Resources, and Incentives
Interplay Nodes
Sustained Competency
The interplay of Strategic Clarity and Operational Clarity
Contextual Fairness
The interplay of Strategic Clarity and Execution Clarity
Autonomy
The interplay of Operational Clarity and Execution Clarity
Outcomes
◎
Engagement
Deep commitment and connection to organizational purpose
◎
Performance
Aligned, efficient execution toward strategic goals
◎
Adaptability
Organizational resilience and capacity for reinvention & innovation
Independent Validation — Precision Consulting Company, 2023
Instrument reliability: Cronbach's Alpha confirmed across all nine constructs — ranging from α = .727 to α = .910. No construct required deletion. Every survey item was retained.

Inter-construct correlations: All relationships between dimensions and interplay nodes confirmed positive and statistically significant (p < 0.01) — validating the internal architecture of the framework.

Synergy effect: Combining dimensions produces stronger correlations than individual dimensions alone — e.g., Strategic + Execution Clarity → Contextual Fairness rises from r = .745/.791 to r = .807.

Outcome prediction: The full framework (dimensions + interplays) correlates with Engagement at r = .841, Performance at r = .819, and Adaptability at r = .748 — all at p < 0.01.
How It Works

From survey to clarity
in days, not months.

The E² Assessment is a three-phase engagement designed for organizational efficiency and actionability. From setup to developmental recommendations, the process is structured, confidential, and built for results.

Phase 01
01
Data Collection
Your organization receives a unique access code and a defined data collection window — typically two to three weeks. All levels of the organization are invited to participate anonymously via any device. The 33-item assessment takes approximately 8 minutes to complete, including two open-ended qualitative questions.
Phase 02
02
Assessment & Report
Quantitative construct scores are computed, benchmarked against the national dataset and your industry category, and visualized. Open-ended responses undergo our Proprietary Linguistic Qualitative Coded Analysis (PLQCA) to surface salient organizational themes. A comprehensive, confidential report is delivered — and reviewed with your leadership team to ensure full understanding and actionability.
Phase 03
03
Development Initiatives
The report is the beginning, not the end. Integral Advantage® offers tailored organizational leadership seminars, workshops, and executive development engagements rooted in the E² findings. Your organization's diagnosis becomes the foundation for precision-targeted development investment — eliminating the guesswork from leadership development.
Research & Validity

11 years of development.
Independently validated.
Unambiguous results.

The Entrusted Empowerment® framework was first conceptualized by Robert Radi, Ph.D. in 2015 and rigorously refined through more than a decade of strategic consulting, executive leadership development, and applied organizational research across the United States. The 33-item survey instrument was developed over 18 months at Integral Advantage® and independently validated in 2023 by Precision Consulting Company using Cronbach's Alpha reliability analysis and Pearson correlation coefficients on a controlled sample of 552 professionals across 25 industries. The results are unambiguous: every construct is reliable, every relationship is significant, and the framework's internal architecture is mathematically confirmed.

.727–.910
Cronbach's Alpha Range
All nine constructs independently confirmed reliable — ranging from α = .727 (Adaptability) to α = .910 (Strategic Clarity). Every construct exceeds the accepted .700 threshold. No item was deleted. No construct was modified. The instrument measures exactly what it was designed to measure.
r = .841
Dimensions + Interplays → Engagement
When all six constructs — three dimensions and three interplay nodes — are combined, the correlation with Engagement reaches r = .841, Performance r = .819, and Adaptability r = .748, all at p < 0.01. Critically, adding the interplay nodes consistently raises the correlations above dimensions alone — proving the framework's architecture delivers more than the sum of its parts.
r = .842
Inter-Construct Synergy
The framework's internal logic is mathematically confirmed: each dimension predicts its theoretically associated interplay node, and combining dimensions amplifies those correlations. Strategic + Operational Clarity → Sustained Competency rises to r = .842. Strategic + Execution Clarity → Contextual Fairness reaches r = .807. The architecture is not theoretical — it is proven.
Reliability and correlation analysis independently conducted by Precision Consulting Company, Las Vegas, NV  ·  May 2023  ·  n=552
Dimension → Interplay Correlations
Strategic Clarity → Contextual Fairness r = .745
Execution Clarity → Contextual Fairness r = .791
SC + EC → Contextual Fairness r = .807 ↑
Operational Clarity → Sustained Competency r = .800
Strategic Clarity → Sustained Competency r = .798
OC + SC → Sustained Competency r = .842 ↑
Execution Clarity → Autonomy r = .676
Operational Clarity → Autonomy r = .673
EC + OC → Autonomy r = .714 ↑
Framework → Outcome Correlations
Dimensions alone
→ Engagement r = .801
→ Performance r = .799
→ Adaptability r = .714
Dimensions + Interplay Nodes
→ Engagement r = .841 ↑
→ Performance r = .819 ↑
→ Adaptability r = .748 ↑
All correlations significant at p < 0.01 (2-tailed).
n = 552 · Independent validation by Precision Consulting Company, May 2023
Framework development: 2015 – present, Robert Radi, Ph.D. & Integral Advantage®, Inc.  ·  Validation study: n=552 qualified professionals across 25 US industries, independent third-party analysis by Precision Consulting Company, May 2023.  ·  Longitudinal sample: 700+ respondents across 26 industry categories, growing with every confirmed cross-sectional assessment.  ·  Published research: Inception Mindset: The Contextual Art and Science of Leading in a Permanently Complex World, Robert Radi, Ph.D. (ISBN: 978-1990461507).
The Assessment in Practice

What organizations discover
when they look honestly.

Three sectors. Three different profiles. One consistent finding: the data reveals what leadership conversations alone cannot. All cases are based on actual E² assessments conducted by Integral Advantage®.

SLED Government
A regional public agency with 31 staff members already implementing — before the report arrived.
What the data showed
Strategic Clarity and Contextual Fairness both below benchmark. Employees understood the mission but felt the system wasn't fair — incentives were misaligned, communication was inconsistent, and strategic intent wasn't translating into execution.
What the workshop surfaced
The PLQCA revealed what the numbers suggested but couldn't name: a merit-based recognition system that employees valued, operating inside a broader culture where decision-making felt opaque. The gap between visible fairness and felt fairness was the real issue.
What changed
Leadership had already begun acting on the framework before the formal report — a signal the diagnostic resonated at a level that bypassed the usual resistance to organizational feedback.
n=31
Respondents
+11.3%
Adaptability vs Benchmark
Federal Government
A federal law enforcement agency running on dedication — and the data proved it.
What the data showed
All three dimensions at benchmark. Autonomy dramatically above at +8% — agents are highly self-directed. But Contextual Fairness was suppressed, and the PLQCA returned the highest possible severity scores (Frequency 10, Magnitude 10) on Funding and Resources, and Frequency 9, Magnitude 9 on Leadership issues.
What the workshop surfaced
Despite structural constraints — budget limitations, outdated technology, leadership gaps — Engagement and Adaptability were above benchmark. The workforce was compensating for systemic shortfalls through personal commitment. A strength, and a warning: dedication is not a sustainable substitute for structural support.
What changed
The Leadership and Professional Development Division used the report to prioritize a structured leadership development pipeline — addressing the root cause that the numbers had precisely identified, rather than the symptoms that had dominated prior conversations.
n=77
Respondents
+8.0%
Autonomy vs Benchmark
Private Sector
Leadership believed culture was strong. The assessment found the fault line.
What the data showed
Operational Clarity and Execution Clarity were the lowest-scoring constructs — well below benchmark. Performance and Engagement lagged despite a leadership team that characterized the culture as collaborative and high-functioning. The gap between leadership perception and employee experience was quantified for the first time.
What the workshop surfaced
The PLQCA identified a recurring theme invisible in prior engagement surveys: employees felt trusted but unclear — they had autonomy without sufficient operational structure to deploy it effectively. The problem wasn't motivation. It was architecture.
What changed
Development investment shifted from culture initiatives to operational and execution clarity work — redesigning role definitions, accountability metrics, and process protocols. Within one cycle, leadership had a precise target instead of a general intention.
C-suite
Sponsor level
Precise
Development target
For Assessment Participants

Have an access code?

If your organization is currently conducting an E² assessment, enter the access code provided by your administrator to begin.

Your code looks like: ORG-1234
Get Started

Ready to diagnose
your organization?

The Entrusted Empowerment® assessment is available exclusively through Integral Advantage®. Tell us about your organization and we'll be in touch to discuss the engagement.

Something went wrong. Please try again or email us directly at CenterForIA@gmail.com.
✓  Thank you — we'll be in touch shortly. In the meantime, feel free to explore integraladvantage.com to learn more about Integral Advantage®.
Prefer to reach us directly?   CenterForIA@gmail.com  ·  integraladvantage.com  ·  (760) 203-4959